Bail Applicants Must Disclose Criminal Antecedents and Prior Pleas before the Supreme Court

In Kaushal Singh v. The State of Rajasthan [2025 INSC 871], the Supreme Court directed that every High Court in the country should consider incorporating a provision in their respective Rules, similar to the one framed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Such a provision mandates that every bail application must state whether a similar plea has been moved before the Supreme Court and, if so, the result thereof.

Cheque Dishonour Case Must be Filed at the Place of the Payee’s Home Branch

Complaints relating to dishonour of account payee cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must be instituted only before the court that has jurisdiction over the branch of the bank where the payee maintains their account ( the home branch of the payee), observed the Supreme court in Jai Balaji Industries Ltd. and Ors. v. M/s HEG Ltd [2025 INSC 1362].

Unmarried Hindu Daughter Attained Majority Has Right to Claim Maintenance

The Section 20 the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 casts a statutory obligation on a Hindu father to maintain his daughter, who is unmarried and unable to maintain herself out of her own earnings or other property, the High Court of Kerala observed in Gireesh Kumar. N v. Rajani K.V. & Anr.

Arrested Person Must Be Informed of Grounds in a Language He/she Understands

In Mihir Rajesh Shah v. The State of Maharashtra and Another [2025 INSC 1288], the Supreme Court observed that a person arrested for any offence under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) or Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) must be supplied with the written grounds of arrest in a language that he or she understands. Otherwise, the arrest and subsequent remand will be rendered illegal. This stipulation was previously limited to UAPA/PMLA offences.