Proving the Signature of the Testator and Its Attestation Not Sufficient to Prove the Will When Suspicious Circumstances Exist

Proof of will is not just proving the signature of the testator on the Will and its attestation in terms of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act; rather it is an exercise to satisfy the Court's conscience that the testator had signed the Will with free will being aware of its contents and after understanding the nature and effect of the dispositions in the Will, observed the Supreme Court in Sardari Lal v. Bishan Dass & Ors [2026 INSC 669].

Prior Sanction Not Needed in Cases Relating to Misappropriation of Funds

Prior Sanction under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is required only where the alleged offence is relatable to any recommendation made or any decision taken, by the public servant in discharge of official functions or duties and in all other cases, prior approval is not required, observed Kerala High court in Mini M. v. State of Kerala and Another [2026:KER:36757].

Simultaneous Civil and Criminal Proceedings May Continue in Respect of the Same Cheque Transaction

In Vishnu Dutt Sharma v. Daya Sapra [(2009) 13 SCC 729], held that there is no legal bar to the simultaneous continuation of civil and criminal proceedings arising out of the same cheque transaction or cause of action. The pendency of one proceeding does not preclude or affect the maintainability of the other, as both remedies are distinct in their nature, scope, and object.

Probate Becomes Optional Following the 2025 Amendment to the Indian Succession Act

With the omission of Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and consequential amendments to related provisions, beneficiaries and executors are no longer required to obtain probate merely to establish their rights or transfer assets under a valid will in the erstwhile Presidency Towns of Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata, where probate had historically been mandatory. Even uncontested wills often required probate proceedings before immovable property could be transferred or financial assets released.

Private Vehicle in a Public Road does not Become Public Place for Searches Under NDPS Act

Where a private vehicle is searched in a public place on the basis of prior information received by the detecting officer, Section 43 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act) is not attracted and compliance with Section 42 is mandatory, observed the High Court of Kerala in Sudin Babu v. State of Kerala [2026:KER:43659].